Tag: Kerry

On the Brink of Peace

air-force-sun-research-770x434-5df2574cf10fd

Many of the previous foreign policy makers of our country have turned a blind-eye to the evil that has emanated from Iran over the years. A glance back helps to explain where we are now, how we got here, and what we need to do moving forward.

The year was 1979. Fifty-two of our people were being held hostage in a U.S. Embassy in Tehran. Our own would be forced to endure captivity for over a year.

The Iranian regime had claimed that Americans were being held by a group of “students.” This would be the first of many falsehoods to come. The truth was the real hostage takers were actually armed personnel who reported to dictator Ayatollah Khomeini.

Iran adopted a strategy of attacking the United States and her allies in an indirect manner, thereby making things appear to be something other than what they actually were. Plotting continued over the years via the application of a deceitful formula that used proxies, militias, terrorist organizations, and the like as covers behind which the country could slyly hide.

The scheme ultimately expanded into an enterprise of indirect warfare led by international war criminal and terrorist Qasem Soleimani. It would tragically remain in place. But thanks to action taken by President Donald Trump, which culminated in a precision drone strike, Soleimani’s sinister reign came to an end.

For those who dispassionately examine the facts, the take-down of Soleimani is good news, not only for the Middle East, but for the world. As the architect of the Iranian effort to exert influence outside of the country’s borders, under his diabolical direction roadside bombs were provided to Sunni terrorists, support was supplied and advice was given to the terrorist group Hezbollah, a civil war in Yemen was fomented, and Shiite militias were used to attack U.S. personnel and interests.

Soleimani planned and implemented almost all of the terrorist attacks of the Iranian regime and its proxy groups across the globe. The Shiite terrorist organizations throughout the Middle East were under his control. He and his proxy groups were behind the flow of IEDs to Iraq and Afghanistan, he used rooftop snipers in both Iran and Iraq to kill protesters who were demonstrating, and on and on it went.

Much as it did with ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi in labeling him an “austere religious scholar,” The Washington Post called international terrorist Soleimani a “most revered military leader.” Rather than revered, the overwhelming majority of Iranians viewed him as a brutal participant of an oppressive regime.

Mere days before Soleimani was removed by the American military, he appeared to be trying to conjure up a sequel to the above referenced hostage crisis of 1979. But this time around, instead of “students” Soleimani used “protesters” to attack a U.S. Embassy in Baghdad.

President Trump’s action in removing Soleimani stands in stark contrast to the feeble policies of past administrations toward Iran. This, in part, may explain why Democrat lawmakers and former Obama administration officials displayed such inexplicable and over-the-top public reactions to President Trump’s Iranian action.

Democrat Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi used language that implied a war crime had been committed. She additionally used a legislative session to pass an unconstitutional resolution to place restraints on presidential power.

Former Obama deputy national security adviser Ben Rhodes, who was instrumental in the promotion of the disastrous Iran nuclear deal, came forward to claim that President Trump’s action would lead to war. He wrote via his Twitter account that the drone strike on a terrorist leader “is a really frightening moment…”

Former Obama Defense Department official Kelly Magsamen tweeted that she was “honestly terrified” and sent up an additional prayer petition of “God help us.”

While at a recent campaign event for Democrat 2020 presidential candidate Joe Biden, former Obama secretary of state John Kerry weighed in with his assessment of President Trump’s decision, characterizing it as a “tragedy” and stating the following: “If this develops into a tit for tat increased effort, it will become a war that is needless, it didn’t have to happen, and it will be a reckless war of choice by the president of the United States.”

Interestingly, in a recent appearance on CBS’s “Face the Nation,” Kerry was asked about his role in releasing billions of dollars to Iran while serving in the Obama administration. He responded to the question with a non-responsive reference to the president’s tweet on the subject.

He had admitted to CNBC back in 2016 that “some” of the money would end up in the hands of “entities, some of which are labeled terrorists.”

Fast forward to 2020. When asked in the above referenced CBS appearance why he believed the release of the money was a risk worth taking, Kerry failed to respond, choosing to attack the president instead. He never did explain why he authorized giving a lawless regime an extraordinary amount of money without knowing where the funds would end up.

President Trump has been remarkably consistent. He has shown a great deal of restraint in his use of limited targeted action, while still displaying strength and resolve. It is clear from Iran’s failed missile attack against U.S. forces in Iraq that the regime has a healthy fear of the Trump administration. And so it should.

In the aftermath of the Soleimani saga, a healthy fear is precisely what is needed to keep our country and the world solidly on the brink of peace.

John Kerry’s Contemptible Collusion

kerry-facepalm-550x413

Former Secretary of State John Kerry has been colluding with the enemy, back-channeling with leaders of a totalitarian regime that fosters terrorism, and working against the national security interests of the United States.

Kerry has committed a textbook violation of the Logan Act, a 1799 law that has never resulted in a conviction. The law is violated when a private citizen negotiates without authorization on behalf of the United States in disputes with foreign governments.

The rationale behind the law seeks to prevent an individual with international contacts from thwarting the policy of the nation. This is exactly what Kerry has been attempting.

Why bring up a law from centuries past?

Four days into the Trump presidency acting Attorney General Sally Yates, an Obama administration holdover, raised the very same Logan Act to claim that General Michael Flynn, a former Trump administration national security adviser, was in violation of the law due to Flynn’s perfectly proper discussion with the Russian ambassador during the transition period leading to the inauguration of President Donald Trump.

The law that Yates cited, which was passed during the administration of President John Adams, was not intended to apply to incoming officials during a transition period between presidential administrations.

The Logan Act was also used during the 2016 presidential campaign to attack then-candidate Trump when he humorously asked the Russians to reveal the 30,000-plus emails, which Hillary Clinton had illegally deleted from her server.

At least twice in the past two months Kerry has engaged in what Matt Viser of the Boston Globe termed “shadow diplomacy,” meeting with Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif in order to seek a way to preserve the discredited and dubious Iran nuclear deal.

Kerry is apparently selfishly seeking to save what he believes is his personal legacy, while acting against current U.S. policy as well as the best interests of the Western world.

The Iran deal, which was struck in 2015 by the Obama administration, is now viewed as a toothless transaction at best, and at worst it is considered a dangerous pathway that enables Iran to become a nuclear power.

This is the same abominable deal that in January of 2016 the public learned that a jet carrying $400 million in euros, Swiss francs, and other currencies had landed in Tehran. The money was purportedly a partial payment of an outstanding claim by Iran. Soon afterward another $1.3 billion in cash followed, for a total of $1.7 billion in cash handed to the Iranians.

The Iran deal was one of the key policy issues litigated during the last presidential election, and the American people chose the policy that then-candidate Trump frequently enunciated, that the Iran deal needed to be terminated.

Trump has until May 12 to decide whether to continue on with the agreement. He has indicated that he intends to pull out of the Iran deal.

The Boston Globe called Kerry’s meeting with the Iranians “stealthy” and reported that Kerry is using his contacts acquired “during his time as the top U.S. diplomat to try to apply pressure on the Trump administration from the outside.” This is a Logan Act violation pure and simple.

Each day for a year and a half now news outlets such as CNN and MSNBC have been repeating the term “collusion” Meanwhile when Kerry colludes with a dangerous enemy to undermine a duly elected president, the appropriate media outrage is predictably missing.

If there were ever a clear cut example of a Logan Act violation it would be when a former top diplomat actively works against the United States with a totalitarian terrorist-supporting state, which is simultaneously seeking to acquire the capability to nuke both Israel and America.

This comes as no surprise when one considers Kerry’s history of cavorting with enemies and undermining American foreign policy. In the 1970s, Kerry traveled to Paris, France to meet with leaders of an enemy against which the United States was fighting a war, the North Vietnamese Communists. This, too, was a violation of the Logan Act.

In the 1980s, Kerry championed the Nuclear Freeze, which in response to Soviet placement of ballistic missiles in Eastern Europe, urged the U.S. to respond with a nonsensical policy of no response.

It has been reported that Kerry is considering a second run for president in 2020 to take on President Trump. However, Kerry’s contemptible collusion with Iran should utterly disqualify him as a candidate for any political office in the nation.